Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Abdul Cunningham, 13-14583 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 13-14583 Visitors: 363
Filed: Jun. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-14583 Date Filed: 06/25/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14583 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:13-cr-00076-GAP-KRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ABDUL CUNNINGHAM, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 25, 2014) Before CARNES, Chief Judge, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Tracy N. DaCruz, appointe
More
             Case: 13-14583    Date Filed: 06/25/2014   Page: 1 of 2


                                                            [DO NOT PUBLISH]



               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                         ________________________

                                No. 13-14583
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                          ________________________

                  D.C. Docket No. 6:13-cr-00076-GAP-KRS-1


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                     versus

ABDUL CUNNINGHAM,

                                                            Defendant-Appellant.

                          ________________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Florida
                        ________________________

                                 (June 25, 2014)

Before CARNES, Chief Judge, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Tracy N. DaCruz, appointed counsel for Abdul Cunningham in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
              Case: 13-14583     Date Filed: 06/25/2014    Page: 2 of 2


Cunningham and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
,

87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the record

reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.

Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of

merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cunningham’s

convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.




                                           2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer