Filed: Jun. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-14583 Date Filed: 06/25/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14583 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:13-cr-00076-GAP-KRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ABDUL CUNNINGHAM, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 25, 2014) Before CARNES, Chief Judge, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Tracy N. DaCruz, appointe
Summary: Case: 13-14583 Date Filed: 06/25/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14583 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:13-cr-00076-GAP-KRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ABDUL CUNNINGHAM, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 25, 2014) Before CARNES, Chief Judge, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Tracy N. DaCruz, appointed..
More
Case: 13-14583 Date Filed: 06/25/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-14583
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:13-cr-00076-GAP-KRS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ABDUL CUNNINGHAM,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(June 25, 2014)
Before CARNES, Chief Judge, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Tracy N. DaCruz, appointed counsel for Abdul Cunningham in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
Case: 13-14583 Date Filed: 06/25/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Cunningham and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cunningham’s
convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2