Filed: Jul. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-15070 Date Filed: 07/02/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-15070 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00230-SDM-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DARRELL LEN HAMILTON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 2, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Sharon Samek, appointed counsel for
Summary: Case: 13-15070 Date Filed: 07/02/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-15070 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00230-SDM-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DARRELL LEN HAMILTON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 2, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Sharon Samek, appointed counsel for D..
More
Case: 13-15070 Date Filed: 07/02/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-15070
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00230-SDM-AEP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DARRELL LEN HAMILTON,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(July 2, 2014)
Before HULL, MARCUS and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Sharon Samek, appointed counsel for Darrell Len Hamilton, has moved to
withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
Case: 13-15070 Date Filed: 07/02/2014 Page: 2 of 2
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel=s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Hamilton’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2