Filed: Jul. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-15557 Date Filed: 07/31/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-15557 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:12-cr-00278-WTM-GRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTONIO TAVARIS BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (July 31, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, HULL and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-15557 Date Filed: 0
Summary: Case: 13-15557 Date Filed: 07/31/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-15557 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:12-cr-00278-WTM-GRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTONIO TAVARIS BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (July 31, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, HULL and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-15557 Date Filed: 07..
More
Case: 13-15557 Date Filed: 07/31/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-15557
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:12-cr-00278-WTM-GRS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANTONIO TAVARIS BROWN,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(July 31, 2014)
Before TJOFLAT, HULL and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-15557 Date Filed: 07/31/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Solomon A. Amusan, appointed counsel for Antonio Tavaris Brown, has
moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief
pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion is GRANTED, and Brown’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2