Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Julio Cesar Gonzalez-Mendoza, 14-10401 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-10401 Visitors: 92
Filed: Aug. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-10401 Date Filed: 08/25/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10401 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00170-MMH-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JULIO CESAR GONZALEZ-MENDOZA, a.k.a. Marvin Alonzo Osorto-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 25, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, ROSENBAUM and KRAVITCH, Circu
More
            Case: 14-10401   Date Filed: 08/25/2014   Page: 1 of 2




                                                          [DO NOT PUBLISH]



             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 14-10401
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00170-MMH-MCR-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus

JULIO CESAR GONZALEZ-MENDOZA,
a.k.a. Marvin Alonzo Osorto-Hernandez,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Middle District of Florida
                      ________________________

                             (August 25, 2014)

Before TJOFLAT, ROSENBAUM and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 14-10401     Date Filed: 08/25/2014   Page: 2 of 2


      Sylvia A. Irvin, appointed counsel for Julio Cesar Gonzalez-Mendoza in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gonzalez-Mendoza’s conviction

and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer