Filed: Oct. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-11451 Date Filed: 10/30/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11451 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:13-cr-80034-KAM-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTONIO MARKEITH BEVERLY, a.k.a. Tony, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (October 30, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-
Summary: Case: 14-11451 Date Filed: 10/30/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11451 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:13-cr-80034-KAM-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTONIO MARKEITH BEVERLY, a.k.a. Tony, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (October 30, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-1..
More
Case: 14-11451 Date Filed: 10/30/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-11451
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 9:13-cr-80034-KAM-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANTONIO MARKEITH BEVERLY,
a.k.a. Tony,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(October 30, 2014)
Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-11451 Date Filed: 10/30/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Michael J. Entin, appointed counsel for Antonio Beverly in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Beverly and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Beverly’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2