Filed: Dec. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-10365 Date Filed: 12/17/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10365 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00363-JSM-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALAIN CEBALLOS-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 17, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, JILL PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-10365 Dat
Summary: Case: 14-10365 Date Filed: 12/17/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10365 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00363-JSM-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALAIN CEBALLOS-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 17, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, JILL PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-10365 Date..
More
Case: 14-10365 Date Filed: 12/17/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-10365
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00363-JSM-AEP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ALAIN CEBALLOS-RODRIGUEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(December 17, 2014)
Before TJOFLAT, JILL PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-10365 Date Filed: 12/17/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Victor D. Martinez, appointed counsel for Alain Ceballos-Rodriguez
(“Ceballos”) in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of
the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the
appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no
arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Ceballos’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2