Filed: Feb. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-10238 Date Filed: 02/05/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10238 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00513-AT-JFK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL ADE ODUKOYA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (February 5, 2015) Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-10238 Date Fil
Summary: Case: 14-10238 Date Filed: 02/05/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10238 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00513-AT-JFK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL ADE ODUKOYA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (February 5, 2015) Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-10238 Date File..
More
Case: 14-10238 Date Filed: 02/05/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-10238
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00513-AT-JFK-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL ADE ODUKOYA,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(February 5, 2015)
Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-10238 Date Filed: 02/05/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Jamila M. Hall, appointed counsel for Michael Odukoya in this criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Odukoya’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2