Filed: Mar. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-11534 Date Filed: 03/16/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11534 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00553-VMC-AEP-13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHERYL LYNN HUMPHREY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (March 16, 2015) Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-11534 Date F
Summary: Case: 14-11534 Date Filed: 03/16/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11534 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00553-VMC-AEP-13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHERYL LYNN HUMPHREY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (March 16, 2015) Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-11534 Date Fi..
More
Case: 14-11534 Date Filed: 03/16/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-11534
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00553-VMC-AEP-13
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHERYL LYNN HUMPHREY,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(March 16, 2015)
Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-11534 Date Filed: 03/16/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Tom Dale, appointed counsel for Cheryl Humphrey in this direct criminal
appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared
pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Humphrey’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
2