Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Derrick Bailey, 14-14129 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-14129 Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-14129 Date Filed: 03/16/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-14129 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00054-CAR-CHW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DERRICK BAILEY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (March 16, 2015) Before MARTIN, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Charles E. Cox, Jr., counsel
More
              Case: 14-14129     Date Filed: 03/16/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                             [DO NOT PUBLISH]

                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                         FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                           ________________________

                                 No. 14-14129
                             Non-Argument Calendar
                           ________________________

                   D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00054-CAR-CHW-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                       versus

DERRICK BAILEY,

                                                               Defendant-Appellant.
                           ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Georgia
                         ________________________
                               (March 16, 2015)

Before MARTIN, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Charles E. Cox, Jr., counsel for Derrick Bailey, has filed a motion to

withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
              Case: 14-14129    Date Filed: 03/16/2015   Page: 2 of 2


the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Bailey’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer