Filed: Apr. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-14896 Date Filed: 04/22/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-14896 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00012-MW-GRJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROMON MANDEL THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (April 22, 2015) Before HULL, MARCUS and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Randolph P. Murrell and Jennif
Summary: Case: 14-14896 Date Filed: 04/22/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-14896 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00012-MW-GRJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROMON MANDEL THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (April 22, 2015) Before HULL, MARCUS and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Randolph P. Murrell and Jennife..
More
Case: 14-14896 Date Filed: 04/22/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-14896
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00012-MW-GRJ-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROMON MANDEL THOMAS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(April 22, 2015)
Before HULL, MARCUS and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Randolph P. Murrell and Jennifer Anne Hart, appointed counsel for Romon
Mandel Thomas in this direct criminal appeal, have moved to withdraw from
further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
Case: 14-14896 Date Filed: 04/22/2015 Page: 2 of 2
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsels’s assessment of the relative merit
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record
reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED,
and Thomas=s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2