Filed: May 26, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-11510 Date Filed: 05/26/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 14-11510 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 9:11-cr-80106-KAM-28 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ORESTE ROLANDO CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (May 26, 2015) Before MARTIN and ANDERSON *, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The prior opinion of the panel is vacated, a
Summary: Case: 14-11510 Date Filed: 05/26/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 14-11510 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 9:11-cr-80106-KAM-28 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ORESTE ROLANDO CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (May 26, 2015) Before MARTIN and ANDERSON *, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The prior opinion of the panel is vacated, an..
More
Case: 14-11510 Date Filed: 05/26/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-11510
Non-Argument Calendar
D.C. Docket No. 9:11-cr-80106-KAM-28
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ORESTE ROLANDO CHAVEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
(May 26, 2015)
Before MARTIN and ANDERSON *, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The prior opinion of the panel is vacated, and this opinion is substituted for
it.
*
This order is being entered by a quorum pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).
Case: 14-11510 Date Filed: 05/26/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Robert W. Stickney, appointed counsel for Oreste Rolando Chavez, has
filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and the defendant’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2