Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Luis A. Rodriguez, 14-14277 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-14277 Visitors: 98
Filed: Jun. 15, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-14277 Date Filed: 06/15/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-14277 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00133-JSM-MAP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LUIS A. RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 15, 2015) Before HULL, WILLIAM PRYOR and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Robert Godfrey, appointed c
More
              Case: 14-14277    Date Filed: 06/15/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                              [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                 No. 14-14277
                             Non-Argument Calendar
                           ________________________

                   D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00133-JSM-MAP-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                          versus

LUIS A. RODRIGUEZ,
                                                              Defendant-Appellant.

                         __________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                        _________________________

                                  (June 15, 2015)

Before HULL, WILLIAM PRYOR and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Robert Godfrey, appointed counsel for Luis A. Rodriguez in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant

and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
,

18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
              Case: 14-14277    Date Filed: 06/15/2015   Page: 2 of 2


counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Rodriguez’s

supervised release and subsequent sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer