Filed: Jun. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-14153 Date Filed: 06/23/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14153 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 2:06-cr-14042-JEM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT EARL NETTLES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (June 23, 2015) Before WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-14153 Date
Summary: Case: 13-14153 Date Filed: 06/23/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14153 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 2:06-cr-14042-JEM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT EARL NETTLES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (June 23, 2015) Before WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-14153 Date F..
More
Case: 13-14153 Date Filed: 06/23/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-14153
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 2:06-cr-14042-JEM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROBERT EARL NETTLES,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(June 23, 2015)
Before WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-14153 Date Filed: 06/23/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Alvin E. Entin, appointed counsel for Robert Earl Nettles in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Nettles’s convictions and total
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2