Filed: Jul. 07, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-14732 Date Filed: 07/07/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-14732 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:07-cr-00148-WS-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JESSE JACKSON, a.k.a. Jessie Jackson, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (July 7, 2015) Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Case: 14-
Summary: Case: 14-14732 Date Filed: 07/07/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-14732 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:07-cr-00148-WS-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JESSE JACKSON, a.k.a. Jessie Jackson, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (July 7, 2015) Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Case: 14-1..
More
Case: 14-14732 Date Filed: 07/07/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-14732
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:07-cr-00148-WS-B-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JESSE JACKSON,
a.k.a. Jessie Jackson,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(July 7, 2015)
Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-14732 Date Filed: 07/07/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Barre Dumas, appointed counsel for Jesse Jackson in this criminal appeal,
has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Jackson’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2