Filed: Jul. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-15708 Date Filed: 07/27/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-15708 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00030-JRH-BKE-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SAINTWAIN RONNIE ROBERTS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (July 27, 2015) Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-15708 Date F
Summary: Case: 14-15708 Date Filed: 07/27/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-15708 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00030-JRH-BKE-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SAINTWAIN RONNIE ROBERTS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (July 27, 2015) Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-15708 Date Fi..
More
Case: 14-15708 Date Filed: 07/27/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-15708
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00030-JRH-BKE-3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SAINTWAIN RONNIE ROBERTS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(July 27, 2015)
Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-15708 Date Filed: 07/27/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Henry N. Crane III, appointed counsel for Saintwain Ronnie Roberts in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Roberts’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2