Filed: Sep. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-11078 Date Filed: 09/04/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-11078 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:14-cr-00020-RS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TAVARES LEMOND GAINER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (September 4, 2015) Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Richard M. Summa, appoi
Summary: Case: 15-11078 Date Filed: 09/04/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-11078 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:14-cr-00020-RS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TAVARES LEMOND GAINER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (September 4, 2015) Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Richard M. Summa, appoin..
More
Case: 15-11078 Date Filed: 09/04/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-11078
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:14-cr-00020-RS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TAVARES LEMOND GAINER,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(September 4, 2015)
Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Richard M. Summa, appointed counsel for Tavares Gainer in this appeal, has
moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief
Case: 15-11078 Date Filed: 09/04/2015 Page: 2 of 2
pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gainer’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
2