Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

State of Florida v. Dylan Ray Stewart, 16-4123 (2017)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 16-4123 Visitors: 22
Filed: Oct. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D16-4123 DYLAN RAY STEWART, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed October 5, 2017. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. Ross M. Goodman, Judge. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Andy Thomas, Public Defender, an
More
                                     IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                                     FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA,                    NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
                                     FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
      Appellant,                     DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v.                                   CASE NO. 1D16-4123

DYLAN RAY STEWART,

      Appellee.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 5, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.
Ross M. Goodman, Judge.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant
Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender,
Tallahassee, for Appellee.




PER CURIAM.


      The State appeals a downward departure sentence imposed by the trial court

after Appellee entered an unconditional nolo contendere plea to multiple counts in

five separate cases. The State argues, and Appellee concedes, that the statutory
grounds relied upon by the trial court for the downward departure sentence were

not supported by competent substantial evidence. Nevertheless, Appellee argues

that we should affirm his sentence because the record contains evidence of a non-

statutory ground for a downward departure sentence.         We reject this tipsy-

coachman argument because the ground asserted by Appellee on appeal was not

discussed below and, thus, the State did not have an opportunity to rebut or oppose

this ground. See State v. Hodges, 
151 So. 3d 531
, 536 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).

      Accordingly, we reverse Appellee’s sentence and remand for resentencing at

which the trial court may again impose a downward departure sentence if there is

evidence to support a legally-valid ground. See Bryant v. State, 
148 So. 3d 1251
,

1258 (Fla. 2014).     However, because Appellee pled unconditionally to the

offenses, he has no basis upon which to seek to withdraw his plea. See State v.

Jerry, 
19 So. 3d 1167
(Fla. 1st DCA 2009).

      REVERSED and REMANDED for resentencing.

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.




                                        2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer