Filed: Sep. 26, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-15191 Date Filed: 09/26/2016 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-15191 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:15-cr-00092-RBD-DAB-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RICHARD DAMARICK MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 26, 2016) Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Meghan Ann Collins,
Summary: Case: 15-15191 Date Filed: 09/26/2016 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-15191 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:15-cr-00092-RBD-DAB-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RICHARD DAMARICK MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 26, 2016) Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Meghan Ann Collins, a..
More
Case: 15-15191 Date Filed: 09/26/2016 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-15191
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:15-cr-00092-RBD-DAB-3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RICHARD DAMARICK MITCHELL,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(September 26, 2016)
Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel for Richard Mitchell in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
Case: 15-15191 Date Filed: 09/26/2016 Page: 2 of 2
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Mitchell’s convictions
and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2