Filed: Jul. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED BRIAN WALLACE, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D18-279 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed July 27, 2018 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County, William H. Hallman, III, Judge. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Danielle Renee Rufai, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED BRIAN WALLACE, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D18-279 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed July 27, 2018 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County, William H. Hallman, III, Judge. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Danielle Renee Rufai, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, T..
More
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
BRIAN WALLACE,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-279
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed July 27, 2018
Appeal from the Circuit Court
for Sumter County,
William H. Hallman, III, Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and
Danielle Renee Rufai, Assistant Public
Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman,
Assistant Attorney General, Daytona
Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence. However, as the State properly
concedes, the trial court was without jurisdiction to rule on Appellant’s Florida Rule of
Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) motion while his direct appeal was pending. See, e.g.,
Liranzo-Cruzata v. State,
6 So. 3d 114 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Mowatt v. State,
963 So. 2d
348 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). We therefore reverse the order denying Appellant’s rule
3.800(c) motion and remand for the trial court to enter a new order on Appellant’s
aforementioned motion.
AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; and REMANDED.
EVANDER, BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
2