Reynel v. . Kelly, (1793)
Court: Court of King's Bench
Number:
Visitors: 3
Judges: WHITLOCK, J.
Filed: Jul. 05, 1793
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: It is a fault in the original. JONES and DODERIDGE, JJ., e contra . Here by the custos brevium it is certified that the declaration is on the writ. We cannot give judgment otherwise, for it does not appear to us. If it be certified, he may have an action on the case against the custos brevium. Antea , p. 712; postea , p. 803; 2 Cr., 674; 3 Cr., 287; Palm., 428; 2 Cr., 479. *Page 796
It is a fault in the original.
JONES and DODERIDGE, JJ., e contra. Here by the custos brevium it is certified that the declaration is on the writ. We cannot give judgment otherwise, for it does not appear to us. If it be certified, he may have an action on the case against the custos brevium. Antea, p. 712; postea, p. 803; 2 Cr., 674; 3 Cr., 287; Palm., 428; 2 Cr., 479.
Source: CourtListener
