Strand v. . Blunden, (1793)
Court: Court of King's Bench
Number:
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 05, 1793
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: In case. The judgment was ideo consideratum est quod quaerens recuperaret; and reversed; it ought to have been quod recuperet . H. 2 Car.rot., 121, vel 122; Bendl., 193.
In case. The judgment was ideo consideratum est quod quaerensrecuperaret; and reversed; it ought to have been quod recuperet. H. 2 Car.rot., 121, vel 122; Bendl., 193.
Source: CourtListener
