Filed: Feb. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Navy–Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Joshua A. POINDEXTER Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant _ No. 201800280 _ Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Decided: 7 February 2019 _ Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Eugene H. Robinson, Jr., USMC. Approved Sentence: Reduction to E-1, total forfeiture of pay and allow- ances, confinement for 4 years 1 and a dishonorable discharge. Sen- Camp Foster, Okinawa, Japan
Summary: United States Navy–Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Joshua A. POINDEXTER Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant _ No. 201800280 _ Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Decided: 7 February 2019 _ Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Eugene H. Robinson, Jr., USMC. Approved Sentence: Reduction to E-1, total forfeiture of pay and allow- ances, confinement for 4 years 1 and a dishonorable discharge. Sen- Camp Foster, Okinawa, Japan,..
More
United States Navy–Marine Corps
Court of Criminal Appeals
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Joshua A. POINDEXTER
Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps
Appellant
_________________________
No. 201800280
_________________________
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.
Decided: 7 February 2019
_________________________
Military Judge:
Lieutenant Colonel Eugene H. Robinson, Jr., USMC.
Approved Sentence: Reduction to E-1, total forfeiture of pay and allow-
ances, confinement for 4 years 1 and a dishonorable discharge. Sen-
Camp Foster, Okinawa, Japan, consisting of a military judge sitting
alone.
For Appellant:
Lieutenant Commander Paul D. Jenkins, JAGC, USN.
For Appellee:
Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
1 The Convening Authority suspended confinement in excess of 36 months pursu-
ant to a pretrial agreement.
United States v. Poindexter, No. 201800280
_________________________
Before WOODARD, HUTCHISON, and TANG
Appellate Military Judges.
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are cor-
rect in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s
substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§
859(a), 866(c).
The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are
AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2