Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Opinion No., (1963)

Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports Number:  Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 23, 1963
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — QUESTION: "WHETHER THERE IS ANY AUTHORITY OF LAW FOR REIMBURSEMENT FROM COUNTY FUNDS FOR TRAVELING EXPENSES INCURRED BY THE SHERIFF IN TRANSPORTING DEPENDENT OR ORPHAN CHILDREN TO A PRIVATELY OPERATED ORPHAN'S HOME LOCATED WITHIN OR OUTSIDE OF HIS COUNTY, WHEN EXECUTING AN ORDER BY THE COUNTY COURT COMMITTING A CHILD THERETO PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF 10 Ohio St. 1961 109 [ 10-109 ] " — A SHERIFF OR HIS DEPUTY IS ENTITLED TO REIMBURSEMENT AT THE RATE OF TEN CENTS PER MILE TRAVELED
More

OPINION — AG — QUESTION: "WHETHER THERE IS ANY AUTHORITY OF LAW FOR REIMBURSEMENT FROM COUNTY FUNDS FOR TRAVELING EXPENSES INCURRED BY THE SHERIFF IN TRANSPORTING DEPENDENT OR ORPHAN CHILDREN TO A PRIVATELY OPERATED ORPHAN'S HOME LOCATED WITHIN OR OUTSIDE OF HIS COUNTY, WHEN EXECUTING AN ORDER BY THE COUNTY COURT COMMITTING A CHILD THERETO PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF 10 Ohio St. 1961 109 [10-109]?" — A SHERIFF OR HIS DEPUTY IS ENTITLED TO REIMBURSEMENT AT THE RATE OF TEN CENTS PER MILE TRAVELED WITHIN HIS COUNTY IN EXECUTING A COURT ORDER DIRECTING HIM TO TRANSPORT A CHILD TO A PRIVATELY OPERATED ORPHAN'S HOME. HE WOULD NOT BE ENTITLED TO REIMBURSEMENT FOR SUCH TRAVEL "OUTSIDE" HIS COUNTY. **** NOTE **** HYDEN NOTES: "DOES AG INFER THAT THE SHERIFF IS TO PREPAID HIS TRAVEL TO ORPHAN HOME BUT NOT TO PRIVATE HOME IF SAME IS OUTSIDE THE COUNTY?" CITE: 28 Ohio St. 1961 39 [28-39], 19 Ohio St. 1961 180.43 [19-180.43] (CHARLES OWENS)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer