Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Opinion No., (1963)

Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports Number:  Visitors: 38
Filed: Feb. 28, 1963
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — THE ITEMS MAY BE TRANSFERRED, CONDITIONED ON THE DISCRETION AND WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE BUDGET DIRECTOR. WE WOULD ALSO DIRECT YOUR ATTENTION TO SUBSECTION (B) AND ITS LANGUAGE DEALING WITH 25 PERCENT OF THE APPROPRIATIONS. WE WOULD ALSO DIRECT YOUR ATTENTION TO SUBSECTION (E), THAT NO TRANSFER SHALL BE APPROVED AFTER JUNE 10TH OF THE FISCAL YEAR TO WHICH THE TRANSFER RELATES. CITE; 62 Ohio St. 1961 41.12 [ 62-41.12 ] (JACK SWIDENSKY)

OPINION — AG — THE ITEMS MAY BE TRANSFERRED, CONDITIONED ON THE DISCRETION AND WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE BUDGET DIRECTOR. WE WOULD ALSO DIRECT YOUR ATTENTION TO SUBSECTION (B) AND ITS LANGUAGE DEALING WITH 25 PERCENT OF THE APPROPRIATIONS. WE WOULD ALSO DIRECT YOUR ATTENTION TO SUBSECTION (E), THAT NO TRANSFER SHALL BE APPROVED AFTER JUNE 10TH OF THE FISCAL YEAR TO WHICH THE TRANSFER RELATES. CITE; 62 Ohio St. 1961 41.12 [62-41.12] (JACK SWIDENSKY)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer