Opinion No. 53-0805, (1953)
Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Number:
Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 05, 1953
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — THE OMMISSION FROM PARAGRAPH (C) OF 40 Ohio St. 214 [40-214], OF THE LANGUAGE "HE IS ABLE TO WORK AND IS AVAILABLE TO WORK" WHICH, THEREFORE, HAD COMPRISED THE ENTIRE PARAGRAPH (C) OF SAID SECTION, DID NOT REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT THAT, TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS, AN INDIVIDUAL CLAIMING SUCH BENEFIT MUST BE "ABLE TO WORK" AND BE AVAILABLE FOR WORK. (UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE) CITE: 40 Ohio St. 214 [40-214] (JAMES C. HARKIN)
OPINION — AG — THE OMMISSION FROM PARAGRAPH (C) OF 40 Ohio St. 214 [40-214], OF THE LANGUAGE "HE IS ABLE TO WORK AND IS AVAILABLE TO WORK" WHICH, THEREFORE, HAD COMPRISED THE ENTIRE PARAGRAPH (C) OF SAID SECTION, DID NOT REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT THAT, TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS, AN INDIVIDUAL CLAIMING SUCH BENEFIT MUST BE "ABLE TO WORK" AND BE AVAILABLE FOR WORK. (UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE) CITE: 40 Ohio St. 214 [40-214] (JAMES C. HARKIN)
Source: CourtListener
