Elawyers Elawyers

Opinion No., (1963)

Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports Number:  Visitors: 13
Filed: May 29, 1963
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — THE OTHER TWO MEMBERS OF THE EQUALIZATION BOARD CANNOT DISQUALIFY FROM HEARING THE PROTEST ON THE ASSESSMENT OF THE THIRD MEMBER OF THE BOARD, AND NO OTHER PROVISION CAN BE MADE FOR HEARING THE PROTEST. CITE: 68 Ohio St. 1961 15.42 [68-15.42], ARTICLE II, SECTION 11 (W. J. MONROE)

OPINION — AG — THE OTHER TWO MEMBERS OF THE EQUALIZATION BOARD CANNOT DISQUALIFY FROM HEARING THE PROTEST ON THE ASSESSMENT OF THE THIRD MEMBER OF THE BOARD, AND NO OTHER PROVISION CAN BE MADE FOR HEARING THE PROTEST. CITE: 68 Ohio St. 1961 15.42 [68-15.42], ARTICLE II, SECTION 11 (W. J. MONROE)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer