Filed: Mar. 13, 1967
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 386 U.S. 278 87 S. Ct. 1037 18 L. Ed. 2d 46 Gerald Glen BOYDEN v. CALIFORNIA. No. 57, Misc. Supreme Court of the United States March 13, 1967 Gerald Glen Boyden, pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Jack K. Weber, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee. PER CURIAM. 1 The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S
Summary: 386 U.S. 278 87 S. Ct. 1037 18 L. Ed. 2d 46 Gerald Glen BOYDEN v. CALIFORNIA. No. 57, Misc. Supreme Court of the United States March 13, 1967 Gerald Glen Boyden, pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Jack K. Weber, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee. PER CURIAM. 1 The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S...
More
386 U.S. 278
87 S. Ct. 1037
18 L. Ed. 2d 46
Gerald Glen BOYDEN
v.
CALIFORNIA.
No. 57, Misc.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 13, 1967
Gerald Glen Boyden, pro se.
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Jack K. Weber, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
1
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S. Ct. 824.
2
Mr. Justice STEWART would vacate the judgment and remand for reconsideration in light of the views stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S., at 42, 87 S.Ct., at 837.
