Northington v. Michigan Department of Corrections, 02-8432 (2003)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 02-8432
Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 24, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 538 U.S. 919 NORTHINGTON v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. No. 02-8432. Supreme Court of United States. March 24, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. 2 Ct. App. Mich. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the doc
Summary: 538 U.S. 919 NORTHINGTON v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. No. 02-8432. Supreme Court of United States. March 24, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. 2 Ct. App. Mich. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the dock..
More
538 U.S. 919
NORTHINGTON
v.
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.
No. 02-8432.
Supreme Court of United States.
March 24, 2003.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN.
2
Ct. App. Mich. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). JUSTICE STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.
Source: CourtListener
