Shaw v. Wallace, (1792)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number:
Visitors: 24
Filed: Sep. 01, 1792
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 2 U.S. 179 2 Dall. 179 1 L. Ed. 339 Shaw v. Wallace Supreme Court of Pennsylvania September Term, 1792 1 This cause was set down for trial; but was afterwards continued by the plaintiff. The defendant's attorney, prayed a rule might be granted for security for costs, the plaintiff residing in New York. Moylan, objected, that the motion came too late, after the cause had been marked for trial. 2 But, By the Court: It is never too late to grant the rule, when it will not delay the trial. 3 Rule gr
Summary: 2 U.S. 179 2 Dall. 179 1 L. Ed. 339 Shaw v. Wallace Supreme Court of Pennsylvania September Term, 1792 1 This cause was set down for trial; but was afterwards continued by the plaintiff. The defendant's attorney, prayed a rule might be granted for security for costs, the plaintiff residing in New York. Moylan, objected, that the motion came too late, after the cause had been marked for trial. 2 But, By the Court: It is never too late to grant the rule, when it will not delay the trial. 3 Rule gra..
More
2 U.S. 179
2 Dall. 179
1 L. Ed. 339
Shaw
v.
Wallace
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
September Term, 1792
1
This cause was set down for trial; but was afterwards continued by the plaintiff. The defendant's attorney, prayed a rule might be granted for security for costs, the plaintiff residing in New York. Moylan, objected, that the motion came too late, after the cause had been marked for trial.
2
But, By the Court: It is never too late to grant the rule, when it will not delay the trial.
Source: CourtListener
