Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Harbrucker v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 15-274 (2017)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: 15-274 Visitors: 2
Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey
Filed: Jan. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-0274V Filed: October 13, 2016 UNPUBLISHED **************************** JOHN HARBRUCKER, * * Petitioner, * Joint Stipulation on Damages; v. * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Neurologic * Injuries; Special Processing Unit SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SPU”) AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * **************************** Isaiah R. Kalinowski, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Sarah C. Duncan, U.S.
More
        In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                         No. 15-0274V
                                    Filed: October 13, 2016
                                        UNPUBLISHED

****************************
JOHN HARBRUCKER,                        *
                                        *
                    Petitioner,         *      Joint Stipulation on Damages;
v.                                      *      Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Neurologic
                                        *      Injuries; Special Processing Unit
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                     *      (“SPU”)
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                     *
                                        *
                    Respondent.         *
                                        *
****************************
Isaiah R. Kalinowski, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Washington, DC, for petitioner.
Sarah C. Duncan, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                              DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

        On March 17, 2015, John Harbrucker (“petitioner”) filed a petition for
compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C.
§300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered neurologic
injuries as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine he received on November 26, 2012.
Petition at 1, 3; Stipulation, filed October 11, 2016, at ¶ 4. Petitioner further alleges that
his vaccine-related injuries persisted for more than six months following the vaccination.
Petition at 3; Stipulation at ¶ 4. “Respondent denies that the influenza vaccine caused
petitioner to suffer from neurologic injuries or any other injury or his current condition. ”
Stipulation at ¶ 6.

       Nevertheless, on October 11, 2016, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation,
stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The undersigned


1
  Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2
 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding
damages, on the terms set forth therein.

        The parties stipulate that petitioner shall receive the following compensation:

        A lump sum of $67,500.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
        Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of
        damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 
Id. The undersigned
approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                          s/Nora Beth Dorsey
                                          Nora Beth Dorsey
                                          Chief Special Master




3
  Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.

                                                      2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer