Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY vs. PATSY ARLINE AND ROBERTA STEIN, 75-001002 (1975)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 75-001002 Visitors: 30
Judges: DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Latest Update: Jan. 19, 1977
Summary: Whether Respondent, Patsy Arline and Roberta Stein, doing business in a partnership allowed a non-licensed person to practice cosmetology in their beauty salon, to-wit: one Gloria Gann. Whether Respondent's License No. 19208 should be revoked.Respondents should be suspended ninety days for allowing unlicensed person to practice cosmetology in their salon.
75-1002


STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


STATE BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY,

)



)


Petitioner,

)



)


vs.

) CASE NO.

75-1002

) LICENSE NO. 19208 PATSY ARLINE AND ROBERTA )

STEIN, )

)

Respondents. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


After due notice a public hearing was held before Delphene Strickland, Hearing Officer, Department of Administration, Division of Administrative Hearings, on June 25, 1975, at 10:30

    1. in the Cosmetology Offices at 308 Avenue A, Southwest, Winter Haven, Florida.


      APPEARANCES


      For Petitioner: Ronald C. LaFace

      Counsel for the Board of Cosmetology

      Witness: Ms. Gertie Campbell For Respondent: Patsy Arline

      Roberta Stein


      ISSUES


      Whether Respondent, Patsy Arline and Roberta Stein, doing business in a partnership allowed a non-licensed person to practice cosmetology in their beauty salon, to-wit: one Gloria Gann.


      Whether Respondent's License No. 19208 should be revoked.

      FINDINGS OF FACT


      1. Notice of Service was entered without objection and marked Exhibit 1. The Complaint with the license attached thereto was entered into evidence as Exhibit 2 without objection.


      2. The Respondents were duly sworn.


      3. Respondents admit that they allowed a person who was non- registered to practice cosmetology in the salon known as the Yellow Tulip which they own and operate as a partnership under License No. 19208.


      4. Respondents did not know of the serious consequences of their act.


        CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


      5. The State Board of Cosmetology may suspend, revoke or withdraw any certificate of registration for the violation of any section of Section 477.15, Florida Statutes. Respondents violated Section 477.02(6), F.S., by allowing Gloria Gann to practice cosmetology in the salon owned by said Respondents.


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Suspend the license of Patsy Arline and Roberta Stein d/b/a The Yellow Tulip for a period of thirty (30) days or less at the discretion of the State Board of Cosmetology.


August 27, 1975 Date DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND

Hearing Officer

Division of Administrative Hearings Room 530, Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304

(904) 488-9675


COPIES FURNISHED:


Patsy Arline

3927 Rockledge Drive Rockledge, Florida

Roberta Stein

1650 Seashell Drive Merritt Island, Florida


Gertie Campbell 7409 Huntley Avenue Tampa, Florida


Ronald C. LaFace, Esquire Post Office Box 1752 Tallahassee, Florida


Mary Alice Palmer Executive Director Board of Cosmetology Post Office Box 9087

Winter Haven, Florida 33880


================================================================= AGENCY FINAL ORDER

=================================================================


STATE OF FLORIDA

FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY


STATE BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY,


Petitioner,


vs. CASE NO. 75-1002

LICENSE NO. 19208

PATSY ARLINE AND ROBERTA STEIN,


Respondents.

/


FINAL ORDER


The Florida State Board of Cosmetology adopts as part of the Agency's Final Order the conclusion of law, interpretation of Administrative Rules and findings of fact set forth in the Recommended Order of the Hearing Examiner dated August 27, 1975, copies of which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.


The State Board of Cosmetology feels that the recommended penalty would be unduly harsh under the circumstances of this case since the violation is a first offense and therefore reduces the recommended penalty in the Hearing Examiner's Order of 30 day suspension of salon license to the following:


Letter of Reprimand.


That the entry and publication of this Final Order shall constitute a reprimand or warning to the Respondent not to engage in a course of conduct in the future which would violate the Florida Cosmetology Law, Section 477, Florida Statutes or the Rules and Regulations of the State Board of Cosmetology.

A copy of this Final Order including the reprimand contained herein shall become a part of the Respondent's permanent files.


ENTERED the 22nd day of October, 1975.



Grace Bliss, Chairman

Florida State Board of Cosmetology


Copies Mailed to:


Ms. Patsy Arline 3927 Rockledge Drive Rockledge, Florida


Ms. Roberta Stein 1650 Seashell Drive

Merritt Island, Florida


Docket for Case No: 75-001002
Issue Date Proceedings
Jan. 19, 1977 Final Order filed.
Aug. 27, 1975 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED.

Orders for Case No: 75-001002
Issue Date Document Summary
Oct. 22, 1975 Agency Final Order
Aug. 27, 1975 Recommended Order Respondents should be suspended ninety days for allowing unlicensed person to practice cosmetology in their salon.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer