Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SUSAN ANN CARPENTER vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT, 01-001618 (2001)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 01-001618 Visitors: 31
Petitioner: SUSAN ANN CARPENTER
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT
Judges: FRED L. BUCKINE
Agency: Department of Management Services
Locations: Tampa, Florida
Filed: Apr. 30, 2001
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, July 12, 2001.

Latest Update: Aug. 23, 2001
Summary: Whether wife alleged forgery of her signature, if proven, would cause Department of Retirement to change deceased husband`s selection of Option One retirement pay-out plan. Failed to prove forgery.
7-[2-01 STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF RETIREMENT CL AUG 23 PA _ SUSAN ANN CARPENTER, Petitioner, vs. DOAH Case No. 01-1618 DMS DOR No.: 00-43 SSN# 263-42-0146 DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES DIVISION OF RETIREMENT Respondent. / ee FINAL ORDER PRELIMINARY STATEMENT PRELLMLN ARE After being formally notified of the Division of Retirement’s intent to deny her request to set aside the Option 1 retirement of her deceased husband, Irvin Carpenter, Mrs. Carpenter timely filed a petition for hearing and the case was referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings. , Pursuant to notice, the Division of Administrative Hearings, by its duly designated Administrative Law Judge, Fred L. Buckine, held a formal hearing in the above-styled case on June 7, 2001, in Tampa, Florida. At the formal proceeding, Mrs. Carpenter testified on her own behalf and offered 6 exhibits, which were admitted. Respondent offered the testimony of Ira Gaines, Benefits Administrator, Division of Retirement; Maurice Helms, Bureau Chief, Division - of Retirement; and Donald Welch, Hillsborough Aviation Authority. Respondent offered 6 exhibits, which were admitted. No transcript was ordered and the parties filed their proposed Recommended Orders on July 5 and 9, 2001. A Recommended Order was issued July 12, 2001, which is incorporated by reference into this Final Order. No exceptions to the Recommended “Order have been filed. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES The issue in this case is to determine whether Susan Ann Carpenter should be allowed to set aside the Option 1 retirement of her deceased husband and receive an Option 3 lifetime benefit. FINDINGS OF FACT The Division of Retirement accepts the Findings of Fact set forth in the Recommended Order, which are incorporated herein by reference. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Division of Retirement accepts the Conclusions of Law set forth in the Recommended Order, which are incorporated herein by reference. : ORDER Based on the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED and DIRECTED that the Florida Division of Retirement denies the request of the Petitioner, Susan Ann Carpenter to set aside the Option 1 retirement of her deceased husband. M4 say of Cran uot 2001, in DONE AND ORDERED this 22)” UMMA ta i. Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. ERIN B. SJOSTROM STATE RETIREMENT DIRECTOR DIVISION OF RETIREMENT CEDARS EXECUTIVE CENTER - BUILDING C “9639 NORTH MONROE STREET "TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399-1560 " (850) 488-5541 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW A PARTY WHO IS ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY THIS FINAL ORDER IS ENTITLED TO JUDICIAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO oss SECTION 120.68, FLORIDA STATUTES. REVIEW PROCEEDINGS “ARE GOVERNED BY THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE. SUCH PROCEEDINGS ARE COMMENCED BY FILING ONE COPY OF A NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH THE AGENCY CLERK OF THE DIVISION OF RETIREMENT, AND A SECOND COPY, ACCOMPANIED BY FILING FEES PRESCRIBED BY LAW, WITH THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST DISTRICT, OR WITH THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL IN THE APPELLATE DISTRICT WHERE THE PARTY RESIDES. THE NOTICE OF APPEAL MUST BE FILED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RENDITION OF THE ORDER TO BE REVIEWED. I HEREBY CERTIFY that this Final Order was filed in the official records of the Division of Retirement, and copies distributed by U.S. Mail to the parties d below, on the QQ” day of Gu 1G Loa , 2001. EDDIE C. Boameis Deputy Clerk Division of Retirement Copies furnished to: Susan Ann Carpenter 7137 Silvermill Drive Tampa, FL 33635 Scott W. Fitzpatrick, Esq. Keifner & Renaldo, P.A. 146 Second Street, Suite 300 - St. Petersburg, FL 33701 Judge Fred L. Buckine Division of Administrative Hearings 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, FL 32399-3060 Thomas E. Wright Senior Attorney Division of Retirement P.O. Box 3900 Tallahassee, FL 32315-3900

Docket for Case No: 01-001618
Issue Date Proceedings
Aug. 23, 2001 Final Order filed.
Jul. 12, 2001 Recommended Order issued (hearing held June 7, 2001) CASE CLOSED.
Jul. 12, 2001 Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
Jul. 09, 2001 Proposed Recommended Order filed by Respondent.
Jul. 05, 2001 Memorandum of Law filed by Petitioner.
Jul. 05, 2001 (Proposed) Recommended Order filed by Petitioner.
Jul. 03, 2001 Deposition (of M. Helms) filed.
Jul. 03, 2001 Deposition (of D. Welch) filed.
Jul. 03, 2001 Letter to Judge Buckine from T. Wright (enclosing depositions of M. Helms and D. Welch and Information Release #1999-54) filed.
Jun. 07, 2001 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
Jun. 01, 2001 Notice of Taking Deposition (M. Helms) filed via facsimile.
Jun. 01, 2001 Joint Pre-hearing Stipulation (filed via facsimile).
May 30, 2001 Notice of Taking Deposition (D. Welch) filed.
May 25, 2001 Order Denying Continuance issued.
May 17, 2001 Motion for Continuance filed by Petitioner.
May 09, 2001 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
May 09, 2001 Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for June 7, 2001; 9:00 a.m.; Tampa, FL).
May 07, 2001 Petitioner`s First Request for Production of Documents to Division of Retirement filed.
May 07, 2001 Confirmation of Scheduling in Compliance with Initial Order filed by S. Fitzpatrick.
May 01, 2001 Initial Order issued.
Apr. 30, 2001 Petition filed.
Apr. 30, 2001 Notice of Denying Retirement Benefits filed.
Apr. 30, 2001 Agency referral filed.

Orders for Case No: 01-001618
Issue Date Document Summary
Aug. 22, 2001 Agency Final Order
Jul. 12, 2001 Recommended Order Whether wife alleged forgery of her signature, if proven, would cause Department of Retirement to change deceased husband`s selection of Option One retirement pay-out plan. Failed to prove forgery.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer