Filed: Mar. 12, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2005 TERRY H. CAPONE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF COLUMBIA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-03369-CMC) Submitted: March 10, 2020 Decided: March 12, 2020 Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry H.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2005 TERRY H. CAPONE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF COLUMBIA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-03369-CMC) Submitted: March 10, 2020 Decided: March 12, 2020 Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry H. C..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2005 TERRY H. CAPONE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF COLUMBIA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-03369-CMC) Submitted: March 10, 2020 Decided: March 12, 2020 Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry H. Capone, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Terry H. Capone appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), (d)(3). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Capone v. City of Columbia, No. 3:12-cv-03369-CMC (D.S.C. Sept. 3, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
