Filed: Mar. 13, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7588 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. AMELIA TURNER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, District Judge. (2:09-cr-00003-JPJ-1) Submitted: March 10, 2020 Decided: March 13, 2020 Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Amelia Tu
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7588 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. AMELIA TURNER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, District Judge. (2:09-cr-00003-JPJ-1) Submitted: March 10, 2020 Decided: March 13, 2020 Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Amelia Tur..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7588
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
AMELIA TURNER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big
Stone Gap. James P. Jones, District Judge. (2:09-cr-00003-JPJ-1)
Submitted: March 10, 2020 Decided: March 13, 2020
Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Amelia Turner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Amelia Turner appeals the district court’s order denying her 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(B) (2018) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Turner, No. 2:09-cr-00003-JPJ-1 (W.D. Va. July 23, 2019). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2