Case: 19-20124      Document: 00515253716         Page: 1    Date Filed: 12/31/2019




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT   United States Court of Appeals
                                                     Fifth Circuit

                                                                              FILED
                                                                        December 31, 2019
                                    No. 19-20124
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                                Clerk


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAFAEL AREVALO-SANCHEZ, also known as Manuel Abrigo, also known
as Ricardo Pacheco,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:18-CR-477-1


Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rafael Arevalo-
Sanchez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 

(1967), and United States v. Flores, 

(5th Cir. 2011). Arevalo-Sanchez has not filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected



       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 19-20124    Document: 00515253716     Page: 2   Date Filed: 12/31/2019


                                 No. 19-20124

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                       2