Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Preterm-Cleveland v. Lance Himes, 18-3329 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 18-3329 Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 19a0295p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT PRETERM-CLEVELAND; PLANNED PARENTHOOD + SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION; WOMEN’S MED GROUP ¦ PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION; ROSLYN KADE, M.D.; ¦ PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO, ¦ Plaintiffs-Appellees, ¦ > No. 18-3329 ¦ v. ¦ ¦ ¦ LANCE HIMES, Director, Ohio Department of Health; ¦ KIM G. ROTHERMEL, Secretary, State Medical Board ¦ of Ohio; BRUCE R. SAFERIN
More
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 19a0295p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT PRETERM-CLEVELAND; PLANNED PARENTHOOD ┐ SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION; WOMEN’S MED GROUP │ PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION; ROSLYN KADE, M.D.; │ PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO, │ Plaintiffs-Appellees, │ > No. 18-3329 │ v. │ │ │ LANCE HIMES, Director, Ohio Department of Health; │ KIM G. ROTHERMEL, Secretary, State Medical Board │ of Ohio; BRUCE R. SAFERIN, Supervising Member, │ State Medical Board of Ohio, │ Defendants-Appellants. │ ┘ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati. No. 1:18-cv-00109—Timothy S. Black, District Judge. Decided and Filed: December 13, 2019 Before: COLE; Chief Judge; BATCHELDER, MOORE, CLAY, GIBBONS, SUTTON, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, DONALD, THAPAR, BUSH, LARSEN, NALBANDIAN, and READLER, Circuit Judges.* _________________ ORDER _________________ A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en banc of this case. Sixth Circuit rule 35(b) provides as follows: * Judges Griffin, White, Larsen, and Murphy recused themselves from participation in this case. No. 18-3329 Preterm-Cleveland v. Himes Page 2 The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal. Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal. The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT ___________________________________ Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer