United States v. Randy Williams, 18-3318 (2020)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Number: 18-3318
Visitors: 5
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Feb. 13, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse Office of the Clerk Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn Street Phone: (312) 435-5850 Chicago, Illinois 60604 www.ca7.uscourts.gov ORDER February 13, 2020 Before AMY J. ST. EVE, Circuit Judge UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee No. 18-3318 v. RANDY WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant Originating Case Information: District Court No: 2:17-cr-20049-SLD-EIL-1 Central District of Illinois District J
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse Office of the Clerk Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn Street Phone: (312) 435-5850 Chicago, Illinois 60604 www.ca7.uscourts.gov ORDER February 13, 2020 Before AMY J. ST. EVE, Circuit Judge UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee No. 18-3318 v. RANDY WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant Originating Case Information: District Court No: 2:17-cr-20049-SLD-EIL-1 Central District of Illinois District Ju..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse Office of the Clerk Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn Street Phone: (312) 435-5850 Chicago, Illinois 60604 www.ca7.uscourts.gov ORDER February 13, 2020 Before AMY J. ST. EVE, Circuit Judge UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee No. 18-3318 v. RANDY WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant Originating Case Information: District Court No: 2:17-cr-20049-SLD-EIL-1 Central District of Illinois District Judge Sara Darrow Upon consideration of the MOTION TO CORRECT OPINION, filed on February 11, 2020, by counsel for the appellee, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. On page three of the opinion in the second full paragraph, the third sentence of the paragraph is CORRECTED to read: In those emails, Judge Bruce criticized one of the prosecutors as being “entirely unexperienced” turning a “slam-dunk” case into a “60-40” for the defendant. form name: c7_Order_3J(form ID: 177)
Source: CourtListener
