NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            FILED
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                          FEB 7 2020
                                                                       MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                         U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                            FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No.    19-30147

                Plaintiff-Appellee,              D.C. No. 9:08-cr-00005-DWM-1

 v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM*
MATTHEW SCOTT BURGESS,

                Defendant-Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                            for the District of Montana
                    Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding

                            Submitted February 4, 2020**

Before:      FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

      Matthew Scott Burgess appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the revocation of supervised release and the 24-month sentence

imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 

(1967),

Burgess’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along



      *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
      **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Burgess the

opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed.

      Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 

, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

      Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

      AFFIRMED.




                                          2                                  19-30147