Filed: Apr. 17, 2020
Latest Update: Apr. 17, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1104 DERRICK ALLEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ALICE NEECE MINE; PETER BOLAC, Assistant Executive Director; JOE CERONE, Director; BRIAN OTEN, Special Programs, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:19-cv-00750-TDS-LPA) Submitted: April 14, 2020 Decided: April 17, 2020 Before WILKINSON, QUATTL
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1104 DERRICK ALLEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ALICE NEECE MINE; PETER BOLAC, Assistant Executive Director; JOE CERONE, Director; BRIAN OTEN, Special Programs, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:19-cv-00750-TDS-LPA) Submitted: April 14, 2020 Decided: April 17, 2020 Before WILKINSON, QUATTLE..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1104
DERRICK ALLEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ALICE NEECE MINE; PETER BOLAC, Assistant Executive Director; JOE
CERONE, Director; BRIAN OTEN, Special Programs,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:19-cv-00750-TDS-LPA)
Submitted: April 14, 2020 Decided: April 17, 2020
Before WILKINSON, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derrick Michael Allen, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Derrick Allen appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Allen’s motion to
appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Allen v. Mine, No.
1:19-cv-00750-TDS-LPA (M.D.N.C. Jan. 21, 2020). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2