Filed: Apr. 03, 2020
Latest Update: Apr. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-1899 _ Lee Reddix lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Arkansas Department of Workforce Services lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena _ Submitted: March 31, 2020 Filed: April 3, 2020 [Unpublished] _ Before ERICKSON, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Lee Reddix appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judg
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-1899 _ Lee Reddix lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Arkansas Department of Workforce Services lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena _ Submitted: March 31, 2020 Filed: April 3, 2020 [Unpublished] _ Before ERICKSON, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Lee Reddix appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgm..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-1899
___________________________
Lee Reddix
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Arkansas Department of Workforce Services
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena
____________
Submitted: March 31, 2020
Filed: April 3, 2020
[Unpublished]
____________
Before ERICKSON, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Lee Reddix appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in
this employment discrimination action. Having carefully reviewed the record and the
1
The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
arguments on appeal, we conclude the district court did not err in granting summary
judgment. See Barber v. C1 Truck Driver Training, LLC,
656 F.3d 782, 791 (8th Cir.
2011) (reviewing de novo grant of summary judgment). Accordingly, we affirm the
judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-