Filed: Jun. 24, 2020
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-11013 Document: 00515465123 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/24/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 19-11013 June 24, 2020 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUNIUS EVANS, also known as J, also known as Michigan, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:16-CR-373-32 Before KING, STEWART, and H
Summary: Case: 19-11013 Document: 00515465123 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/24/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 19-11013 June 24, 2020 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUNIUS EVANS, also known as J, also known as Michigan, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:16-CR-373-32 Before KING, STEWART, and HO..
More
Case: 19-11013 Document: 00515465123 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/24/2020
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 19-11013 June 24, 2020
Conference Calendar
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JUNIUS EVANS, also known as J, also known as Michigan,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:16-CR-373-32
Before KING, STEWART, and HO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Junius Evans has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Evans has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 19-11013 Document: 00515465123 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/24/2020
No. 19-11013
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2