Filed: Jun. 15, 2020
Latest Update: Jun. 15, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-3062 _ Catherine Dahlberg lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Radisson Blu Mall of America lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota _ Submitted: June 10, 2020 Filed: June 15, 2020 [Unpublished] _ Before GRASZ, BEAM, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Catherine Dahlberg appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in this emplo
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-3062 _ Catherine Dahlberg lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Radisson Blu Mall of America lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota _ Submitted: June 10, 2020 Filed: June 15, 2020 [Unpublished] _ Before GRASZ, BEAM, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Catherine Dahlberg appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in this employ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-3062
___________________________
Catherine Dahlberg
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Radisson Blu Mall of America
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: June 10, 2020
Filed: June 15, 2020
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRASZ, BEAM, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Catherine Dahlberg appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in this employment discrimination action. Having carefully reviewed the
1
The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of
Minnesota.
record and the arguments on appeal, we conclude the district court did not err in
granting summary judgment. See Torgerson v. City of Rochester,
643 F.3d 1031,
1042 (8th Cir. 2011) (en banc) (reviewing de novo grant of summary judgment).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-