Filed: Oct. 25, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2007 No. 06-15572 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 05-00036-CR-5-4S UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus VINCENTE GUERRERO-GOMEZ, a.k.a. Augustine Ochoa Heredia, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (October 25, 2007) Before BIRCH, DUBINA and MAR
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2007 No. 06-15572 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 05-00036-CR-5-4S UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus VINCENTE GUERRERO-GOMEZ, a.k.a. Augustine Ochoa Heredia, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (October 25, 2007) Before BIRCH, DUBINA and MARC..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
October 25, 2007
No. 06-15572 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 05-00036-CR-5-4S
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
VINCENTE GUERRERO-GOMEZ,
a.k.a. Augustine Ochoa Heredia,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(October 25, 2007)
Before BIRCH, DUBINA and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Spiro T. Kypreos, appointed counsel for Vincente Guerrero-Gomez, a.k.a.
Augustine Ochoa Heredia, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a
brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Guerrero-Gomez’s conviction
and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2