Filed: Oct. 06, 2020
Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-15095 Date Filed: 10/06/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-15095 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:16-cr-00020-JDW-PRL-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CARLOS HUMBERTO MORENO-HERNANDEZ, a.k.a. Carlos Moreno Hernandez, a.k.a. Carlos Garcia Moreno, a.k.a. Jorge Cardenas Martinez, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (Octo
Summary: Case: 19-15095 Date Filed: 10/06/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-15095 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:16-cr-00020-JDW-PRL-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CARLOS HUMBERTO MORENO-HERNANDEZ, a.k.a. Carlos Moreno Hernandez, a.k.a. Carlos Garcia Moreno, a.k.a. Jorge Cardenas Martinez, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (Octob..
More
Case: 19-15095 Date Filed: 10/06/2020 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 19-15095
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:16-cr-00020-JDW-PRL-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CARLOS HUMBERTO MORENO-HERNANDEZ,
a.k.a. Carlos Moreno Hernandez,
a.k.a. Carlos Garcia Moreno,
a.k.a. Jorge Cardenas Martinez,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(October 6, 2020)
Before NEWSOM, LAGOA and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 19-15095 Date Filed: 10/06/2020 Page: 2 of 2
Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel for Carlos Humberto Moreno-
Hernandez in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Moreno-Hernandez’s revocation
of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2