Filed: Jun. 22, 2020
Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2430 ESTRADA TRUST, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ALL ASSETS HELD IN 57995-019/ISMAEL ESTRADA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (4:19-cv-02968-MGL) Submitted: June 18, 2020 Decided: June 22, 2020 Before FLOYD, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Estrada Trust, Appellant
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2430 ESTRADA TRUST, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ALL ASSETS HELD IN 57995-019/ISMAEL ESTRADA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (4:19-cv-02968-MGL) Submitted: June 18, 2020 Decided: June 22, 2020 Before FLOYD, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Estrada Trust, Appellant P..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2430 ESTRADA TRUST, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ALL ASSETS HELD IN 57995-019/ISMAEL ESTRADA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (4:19-cv-02968-MGL) Submitted: June 18, 2020 Decided: June 22, 2020 Before FLOYD, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Estrada Trust, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: The Estrada Trust, by Ismael Estrada, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Estrada Trust v. All Assets Held in 57995- 019/Ismael Estrada, No. 4:19-cv-02968-MGL (D.S.C. Nov. 26, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
