Filed: Oct. 26, 2020
Latest Update: Oct. 26, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1210 CEDRICK E. DRAPER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE C/O MEGAN J. BRENNAN POSTMASTER GENERAL, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Glen E. Conrad, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00070-GEC) Submitted: September 29, 2020 Decided: October 26, 2020 Before KING, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by u
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1210 CEDRICK E. DRAPER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE C/O MEGAN J. BRENNAN POSTMASTER GENERAL, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Glen E. Conrad, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00070-GEC) Submitted: September 29, 2020 Decided: October 26, 2020 Before KING, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by un..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1210 CEDRICK E. DRAPER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE C/O MEGAN J. BRENNAN POSTMASTER GENERAL, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Glen E. Conrad, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00070-GEC) Submitted: September 29, 2020 Decided: October 26, 2020 Before KING, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cedrick Euron Draper, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Cedrick Euron Draper appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Draper v. U.S. Postal Serv., No. 3:18-cv-00070-GEC (W.D. Va. Sept. 26, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
