Filed: Aug. 27, 2020
Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6199 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ALVIN GLASGOW, a/k/a Buju, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cr-00222-LO-1) Submitted: August 25, 2020 Decided: August 27, 2020 Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinio
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6199 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ALVIN GLASGOW, a/k/a Buju, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cr-00222-LO-1) Submitted: August 25, 2020 Decided: August 27, 2020 Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6199
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ALVIN GLASGOW, a/k/a Buju,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cr-00222-LO-1)
Submitted: August 25, 2020 Decided: August 27, 2020
Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alvin Glasgow, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Alvin Glasgow seeks to appeal the district court’s order appointing the Federal
Public Defender to represent Glasgow in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceedings. This court
may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Glasgow seeks to appeal is neither a
final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Glasgow’s motions to appoint counsel, to compel
settlement, and to proceed on the original record, and we dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2