Filed: Oct. 29, 2020
Latest Update: Oct. 29, 2020
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 29 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10002 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:19-cr-02058-CKJ-JR-1 v. MEMORANDUM* FERMIN ORTUNO-VALDOVINOS, AKA Fermin Ortuno, AKA Fermin Ortuno- Valdivinos, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 26, 2020** Before: McKEOW
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 29 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10002 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:19-cr-02058-CKJ-JR-1 v. MEMORANDUM* FERMIN ORTUNO-VALDOVINOS, AKA Fermin Ortuno, AKA Fermin Ortuno- Valdivinos, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 26, 2020** Before: McKEOWN..
More
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 29 2020
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10002
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:19-cr-02058-CKJ-JR-1
v.
MEMORANDUM*
FERMIN ORTUNO-VALDOVINOS, AKA
Fermin Ortuno, AKA Fermin Ortuno-
Valdivinos,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 26, 2020**
Before: McKEOWN, RAWLINSON, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Fermin Ortuno-Valdovinos appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 24-month sentence for reentry of a
removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California,
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ortuno-Valdovinos’s counsel has filed a brief stating that
there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of
record. We have provided Ortuno-Valdovinos the opportunity to file a pro se
supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been
filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
2 20-10002