U.S. v. ROSAS, CR-12-01075-001-TUC-DCB (CRP). (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20140616844
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 13, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 13, 2014
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. BURY, District Judge. This matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and the local rules of practice of this Court for hearing and report and recommendation on the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment. Magistrate Judge Pyle conducted a hearing on April 17, 2014, and issued his Report and Recommendation on April 24, 2014. A copy was sent to all parties. No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. BURY, District Judge. This matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and the local rules of practice of this Court for hearing and report and recommendation on the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment. Magistrate Judge Pyle conducted a hearing on April 17, 2014, and issued his Report and Recommendation on April 24, 2014. A copy was sent to all parties. No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have b..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. BURY, District Judge.
This matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and the local rules of practice of this Court for hearing and report and recommendation on the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment.
Magistrate Judge Pyle conducted a hearing on April 17, 2014, and issued his Report and Recommendation on April 24, 2014. A copy was sent to all parties. No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed. Any objections that have not been raised are waived and will not be addressed by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).
The Court, having made an independent review of the record, orders as follows:
IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Pyle's Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by this Court as the findings of fact and conclusions of law.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment is denied.
Source: Leagle
