Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hanif v. Stewart, 15-00145-WS-N. (2018)

Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama Number: infdco20180402683 Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE , District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed the Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B)-(C), Rule 8(b) of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and S.D. Ala. GenLR 72(a)(2)(R), and dated March 1, 2018, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioner Rehan Hanif's Petition fo
More

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed the Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)-(C), Rule 8(b) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and S.D. Ala. GenLR 72(a)(2)(R), and dated March 1, 2018, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioner Rehan Hanif's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 21) is DISMISSED with prejudice and that Hanif is not entitled to a Certificate of Appealability pursuant to this final adverse order. Finally, the Court certifies that any appeal by Hanif of this dismissal would be without merit and therefore not taken in good faith. Thus, Hanif is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

Final judgment shall issue separately in accordance with this order and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.

DONE and ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer